
This month’s song from John Dog is Leave my Bones Alone. JD is forced by circumstance to read more newspapers than are healthy for any hound, and he makes his disgust clear. For an encore of fury at the pressgang, scroll down to The Right to Know.

Btw, from the training book about PTSD wich I’m reaing up on due to work, I came across a “list of modes of incorrect thinking” that manifests in patients. It applies well to the internet as well, I think, and especially the Is/Pal discussion:
1) All or nothing thinking.
2) Overgeneralization
3) Mental filtering. (Means getting hung up one one detail, loss of perspective)
4) Rash conclusion-process
5) Magnification
6) Emotional reasoning (I feel/believe)
7) Should/Could explanations and declarations.

Major-General Andrew Mackay, a general who led the Afghanistan campaign has resigned over his disillusion in the direction of the Government’s strategy.
Major Gen Mackay, 52, who was the architect of the military’s new counter insurgency doctrine, is said to have told colleagues of his anger at the lack of resources being put into the battle.
He is also said to be “disillusioned” over the failure of the Foreign Office and Department for International Development in fulfilling their obligations in Afghanistan.
The resignation will come as a significant blow to the Government and the Army as Major Gen Mackay, who led a brigade in Helmand, was seen as a leading proponent for readjusting Britain’s counter-insurgency plan that has foundered during three years of fighting in Helmand.
There is the maxim that a customer can judge the cleanliness of a restaurant’s kitchen by the restroom. After much experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, I have discovered another: Soldiers always treat correspondents they way they treat the local people. When soldiers treat correspondents badly, they treat local people even worse and are creating enemies. Those troops who brag about how they mistreat or detest correspondents are abusing and resentful of the local population, and they cannot win this sort of war. The people will kill them and the media will bash them and they will blame the people and the media. When a soldier alienates sympathetic correspondents, he has no real chance against mortal enemies such as the Taliban and al Qaeda, and they will defeat him. Yet there is subtlety: for “the people,” in the case of Media Ops, is you.


(image from Raye Man Kojast)The Guardian's former Iran correspondent Robert Tait is monitoring events from Istanbul. He writes:
Ahmadinejad was giving a live interview on IRIB's Channel Two from the scene of Quds Day. As he spoke, viewers could clealy the chants of "Ahmadi, Ahmadi, resign, resign" - this all over live TV.
Apparently Ahmadinejad was aware of the chants and their effect on the interview. He is said to have become flustered and quickly wrapped up the interview.
Put down your gunLots more today from Raye Man Kojast.
For I am weary from seeing this bloodshed
Whether in Lebanon or Gaza
Whether in Quds or Iran
argh bar RoosiyehMore. Also from Pedestrian, Today, and What We Are After, while her friend Naj has a laugh at the official version, and shows the early editions of tomorrow’s front pages.
- Death to Russia
Roosiyeh Haya Kon, Keshvaremoon ro raha kon
- Russia, leave our country alone!
Na Ghazeh, na Lobnan, janam fadayeh Iran
- My life belongs to neither Gaza nor Lebanon - but Iran
Che Ghazeh, che Iran, margh bar zaleman
- Whether in Gaza or in Iran, death to tyrants
My Dear People of Iran,
For the past thirty years, the Iranian regime has used the cause of the Palestinian people as a way to distract from its own oppressive rule. I thank the people of Iran for showing their support over the years with the people of Palestine, especially because on this day of Qods, the people of Iran suffer under the kind of unelected oppression that is comparable in some ways to that suffered by Palestinians.
As a Palestinian, life-long fighter for the freedom and independence of Palestine and a leader of the first Palestinian intifada, I strongly condemn the Iranian regime’s violations of human rights and repeated use of violence against the nonviolent Iranian protesters, activists and prisoners. I stand in complete solidarity with and support for the Iranian people and am confident that with their resilience, they will achieve a free and democratic Iran to raise their children in and have a good life.
In unity,
Mubarak Awad
The Times has been given access to 500 pages of documents - a small fraction of the total - that include handwritten testimony by victims, medical reports and interviews.
They suggest that security forces have engaged in systematic killing and torture to try to break the opposition.[...] The documents suggest that at least 200 demonstrators were killed in Tehran, with 56 others still unaccounted for, and that 173 were killed in other cities. These are several times higher than the official figures. Just over half of the 200 were killed on the streets. They were beaten around the head or shot in the head or chest as part of an apparent shoot-to-kill policy - there are no reports of demonstrators being shot in the legs.


Azarmehr
Belog
Khordaad88
Pedestrian
Raye Man Kojast?
Revolutionary Road
Rise of the Iranian People
Tehran Bureau
united4iran
Uskowi on Iran

I think I have been pretty honest about the difficulties of the war in Afghanistan while at the same time making an argument for why we should continue and even intensify our efforts there. And I would like to think that - for a blogger on counterinsurgency strategy and operations - I have been pretty honest about the difficulty and limits of prosecuting counterinsurgency campaigns as a third party: to a large degree, your success is dependent upon what the host nation government does and fails to do.The rest here.
“The notion that you can conduct a purely counterterrorist kind of campaign and do it from a distance simply does not accord with reality,” Mr. Gates told reporters last Thursday. “The reality is that even if you want to focus on counterterrorism, you cannot do that successfully without local law enforcement, without internal security, without intelligence.”More.
Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at Georgetown University, concurred, saying the argument that terrorism can be prevented essentially by remote control was “immensely seductive” — and completely wrong.
“We tried to contain the terrorism problem in Afghanistan from a distance before 9/11,” he said. “Look how well that worked.”
No, an ambition of political reform in Afghanistan does not in itself mean that 'we should invade China, North Korea, Burma and others'. There's no principle, whether in international politics or in life more generally, requiring that you must not undertake one good project unless you're willing to undertake every good project of the same kind. If there were, the world would be a worse place than it is; you couldn't do anything good, because it would obligate you to do more good than you could. As it is, the Taliban regime in Afghanistan furnished a casus belli by playing host to al-Qaida; winning the war that this led to involves a project of political reform. That the war could also be lost does not falsify this last proposition.
Diverse drift-days (Diverse drivedage)Dan TurèllThese drift-days, daughter. They are like small lakes to swim in with still-standing water - white lagoons of page after page that we leaf through forward into the day. It’s a rhythm I haven’t known since I was a child.We draw a little, we practice a couple of letters, we go to the zoo. We contemplate each single animal at length. It is as if you want to imprint them for yourself now, as though you perhaps in some place or other know, that they won’t be there much longer.Nothing happens, only an ever closer contact as between those who have just fallen in love, or like when a true friendship is underway. We understand each other better and better.You will soon be five and you will soon forget. Just like all that I have myself forgotten - faded pictures of Father, Mother and child in the Commons Park, 1st May 1954 - that’s how it will be for you. But I say thank you, little treasure, thanks in time, thanks for the slow drifting rhythm, I had otherwise completely forgotten.



The cartoon above is plainly a Holocaust denial. This is as intellectually negligible and contemptible as the belief that the earth is flat. But neither viewpoint should be illegal. So I publish it not because I agree with it or like it, neither is the case.
The Utrecht prosecutor's office said the cartoon case is complicated. “There is no doubt that the Danish cartoons can be offensive,” a spokesperson said. “But according to us, the Holocaust cartoon crosses the line.” Because that line between offensive and discriminatory is so thin, the prosecutor thinks it is up to a judge to decide.




